Flydubai flight FZ1073 left Dubai for Tel Aviv on 30 September 2026 as a routine scheduled passenger flight. Around two and a half hours later, its captain had been seriously wounded inside the cockpit, the Boeing 737 MAX 8 had plunged thousands of feet, passengers were helping restrain the co-pilot and two other flydubai pilots travelling on board were taking control of the aircraft.
The aircraft eventually landed safely at Tabuk in Saudi Arabia. All of the passengers survived.
If you’d like to see what we are getting up to as it’s happening, please give our Instagram a follow @autismfamilytravelguide
Because the incident is still under investigation, some early accounts conflict and several important questions remain unanswered. This article separates what has been established from claims that have not yet been independently confirmed.
Flydubai Flight FZ1073: The Key Facts
| Flight | flydubai FZ1073 |
| Date | 30 September 2026 |
| Airline | flydubai |
| Aircraft | Boeing 737 MAX 8 |
| Planned route | Dubai International Airport (DXB), UAE to Ben Gurion Airport (TLV), Israel |
| Actual landing | Tabuk, Saudi Arabia |
| Captain | Captain Smit Machchhar, an Indian national |
| First officer / co-pilot | An Omani national whose name had not been officially released at the time of writing |
| Passengers | 174 passengers were reported aboard, including 27 children |
| Emergency | The captain was stabbed during a violent cockpit incident and the aircraft entered a rapid descent |
| Who landed the aircraft? | Other flydubai pilots travelling on board took control and the aircraft landed safely at Tabuk |
| Captain’s condition | He underwent medical treatment and surgery in Saudi Arabia and was subsequently reported to be stable and recovering |
| Suspect | The Omani co-pilot was detained by Saudi authorities |
A Timeline of What Happened on Flight FZ1073
Times reported by flight-tracking services and news organisations can differ slightly. The sequence below uses the best-supported information available at the time of writing rather than presenting every early report as established fact.
Around 7:05am: FZ1073 Leaves Dubai
Flight FZ1073 departed Dubai International Airport at around 7:05am local time, bound for Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv.
The aircraft was a Boeing 737 MAX 8. The flight was carrying 174 passengers, including 27 children, according to widely reported figures.
Captain Smit Machchhar was the pilot in command. The first officer was an Omani national whose identity had not been publicly confirmed at the time of writing.
Around Two and a Half Hours Into the Flight: The Cockpit Attack
The flight initially proceeded normally. Around two and a half hours after departure, a violent confrontation developed inside the cockpit.
Israeli officials and multiple passenger accounts say the co-pilot attacked Captain Machchhar, stabbing him and attempting to take control of the aircraft. The precise weapon has not been conclusively established in public reporting: early passenger accounts referred to a knife, while later reporting raised questions about whether an emergency cockpit tool could have been involved.
Investigators are still examining the attacker’s motive. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said investigators suspect radical Islamist indoctrination and suicidal intent. Those statements should be treated as claims from Israeli officials while the Saudi and UAE investigations continue, rather than as a completed finding of fact.
The Aircraft Enters a Rapid Descent
During the cockpit struggle, FZ1073 entered an exceptionally rapid descent.
Different analyses of the flight data have produced slightly different figures. Reuters reported a loss of almost 14,000 feet in under 30 seconds, while other flight-data analyses have described a larger altitude loss over a longer period. Associated Press reporting described the aircraft descending from roughly 33,000 feet to around 17,000 feet before stabilising.
The important point is not the difference between those measurements: the aircraft lost a very large amount of altitude extremely quickly while the cockpit was compromised.
Emergency and Hijacking Codes Are Transmitted
Flight-tracking data showed the aircraft transmitting emergency transponder codes during the incident.
These included 7700, the general emergency code, and 7500, the internationally recognised code used to indicate unlawful interference or hijacking.
The aircraft later returned to the general emergency code.
Captain Machchhar Gets the Cockpit Door Open
One of the most important actions in the entire incident appears to have been taken by the badly wounded Captain Machchhar.
According to Reuters and other major news organisations, he managed to open or unlock the reinforced cockpit door despite his injuries. That allowed people from the cabin to reach the flight deck and intervene.
Some accounts differ on exactly how access was gained, including whether cabin crew emergency-access procedures also played a role. That detail may become clearer as the official investigation reconstructs the cockpit sequence.
Passengers Rush Forward
Several passengers responded to the emergency rather than remaining in their seats.
Reuters identified Yaniv Hayun, a 50-year-old Israeli plumber travelling with his family, as one of the passengers who rushed to help. Hayun said he entered the cockpit, helped overpower the attacker and pulled back on the aircraft controls while the jet was descending.
In an extraordinary detail, Hayun said his familiarity with what the controls did came not from aviation training but from watching the television programme Air Crash Investigation.
Hayun was not acting alone. Other passengers identified in reporting include Tzvika Manes, Assaf Rajuan and dentist Dr Shota Musaev.
Accounts say Manes helped secure the attacker, reportedly using airline headphone or earphone cords, while Musaev helped treat the injured captain. Rajuan also assisted in restraining the co-pilot.
Their precise individual actions are still being reconstructed, but multiple independent reports agree that a small group of passengers played a direct role in bringing the cockpit situation under control.
Two Other Flydubai Pilots Take Over
There was another exceptionally important factor aboard FZ1073: additional flydubai pilots were travelling on the aircraft.
Once the attacker had been restrained and access to the cockpit regained, reserve or off-duty flydubai pilots were able to take over the flying duties.
Major reporting has described two additional pilots being aboard. Their names had not been reliably made public at the time of writing.
One aviation report says the additional crew had been rostered because regional rerouting could extend the flight and potentially affect flight-duty limits. That explanation has not yet been fully detailed publicly by flydubai.
Their presence proved crucial. The captain required urgent medical treatment, while the original first officer was the person being restrained. The additional qualified pilots meant trained Boeing 737 flight crew were available to take control.
FZ1073 Diverts Away From Tel Aviv
The aircraft did not continue to its planned destination at Ben Gurion Airport.
Instead, the crew diverted to Tabuk in north-western Saudi Arabia, where the aircraft could land and Captain Machchhar could receive urgent medical care.
The Aircraft Lands Safely in Saudi Arabia
FZ1073 landed safely at Tabuk.
Saudi authorities detained the Omani co-pilot. Captain Machchhar was taken for medical treatment, while the passengers were eventually transported onwards to Israel on replacement aircraft.
Who Is Captain Smit Machchhar?
Captain Smit Machchhar is an Indian commercial pilot from Mumbai with extensive Boeing 737 experience.
His route into aviation was not straightforward. Reporting based on his earlier interviews and professional history says he initially studied textile engineering and management before an aviation seminar prompted him to pursue pilot training in New Zealand.
Machchhar joined SpiceJet in 2011 and spent more than 11 years with the airline. He progressed to senior commander and line training captain, meaning he was trusted not only to fly but also to train and assess other pilots.
He joined flydubai in 2022 as a direct-entry captain. Published professional information credits him with roughly 9,750 hours on Boeing 737 aircraft, including substantial experience as pilot in command.
That experience became critically important on FZ1073. Despite being seriously wounded, reporting indicates that Machchhar continued resisting the attacker and managed to enable access to the cockpit, creating the opportunity for passengers, crew and the additional pilots to intervene.
How Is Captain Smit Machchhar Recovering?
Captain Machchhar was taken to hospital in Saudi Arabia after the emergency landing and underwent surgery.
On 1 October, Indian diplomatic officials reported that he was in good health and recovering well. Other reporting described his condition as stable following treatment for serious stab wounds.
Because his treatment is ongoing and medical information is private, reports about the exact nature and number of his injuries should be treated cautiously unless confirmed by his family, doctors or official representatives.
Who Was the Omani Co-Pilot?
The first officer accused of attacking Captain Machchhar has been identified publicly as an Omani national, but his name had not been officially released at the time of writing.
Reports suggest he had worked for flydubai for less than a year. His previous flying experience, training history and full employment background have not yet been established publicly through official sources.
Israeli officials have alleged that he had undergone radical Islamist indoctrination and intended to crash the aircraft. The UAE has opened an investigation, and Saudi authorities initially held and questioned him. Until those investigations establish the evidence, claims about motive should be taken with caution.
Why Was an Omani Pilot Operating a Flight to Israel?
This has become one of the biggest questions surrounding FZ1073.
Oman does not have diplomatic relations with Israel. That fact has led to claims that an Omani national should not have been assigned to a Tel Aviv-bound flight.
However, the position is more complicated than saying that an Omani passport automatically prevents a pilot from operating an international airline flight into Israel.
The publicly available UAE–Israel air-services agreement does not appear to contain a blanket rule saying airline personnel must come only from countries that have diplomatic relations with Israel. In fact, its published personnel provisions are broad.
At the same time, Israeli reporting says there may be a separate security or operating arrangement applying specifically to flydubai that restricts which nationalities can operate flights into Israel. Israeli authorities are now investigating how the Omani co-pilot was assigned and whether all route-specific requirements were followed.
There are therefore several possibilities: he may have been properly cleared; there may have been an exemption or additional documentation; a separate restriction may have been breached; or early descriptions of the restriction may be incomplete.
Until the relevant operating and security rules are made public, it would be premature to say simply that an Omani citizen was legally prohibited from flying the route.
Could an Omani Passport Holder Normally Enter Israel?
A pilot operating an international flight and a passenger seeking permission to enter a country are not necessarily in the same legal position.
Israel distinguishes between visa-exempt travellers and people who need an entry visa. Oman’s own foreign ministry advises Omani passport holders to check destination-specific visa requirements before travel.
More importantly for FZ1073, whether a crew member could personally pass Israeli immigration is not necessarily the same question as whether that crew member could legally operate an aircraft into Israeli airspace and Ben Gurion Airport under airline and aviation-security arrangements.
The investigation needs to establish the rules that applied specifically to flydubai flight crew.
What Would Have Happened if FZ1073 Had Continued Towards Israeli Airspace?
Claims that Israel would simply have shot down FZ1073 need to be treated very carefully.
The aircraft had transmitted the 7500 unlawful-interference code during an incident in which control of the cockpit was compromised. That would make the aircraft a serious security concern to authorities responsible for protecting Israeli airspace.
Israel publishes procedures for the interception of civil aircraft. An intercepted aircraft is instructed to follow the intercepting aircraft’s signals, contact air traffic services where possible and use emergency communications and transponder procedures.
That means fighter interception would have been a plausible response if authorities believed an unresponsive or unlawfully controlled aircraft posed a threat while approaching Israel.
It does not follow that the aircraft would automatically have been shot down. The appropriate response would depend on what Israeli authorities knew, whether the aircraft was communicating, its route and behaviour, and whether it was assessed as posing an imminent threat.
International civil-aviation principles place strong emphasis on protecting civilian aircraft. Any claim that FZ1073 definitely or probably would have been destroyed is therefore speculation unless supported by officials with direct knowledge of the decisions being made that morning.
The diversion to Tabuk removed that hypothetical from the immediate emergency: the replacement pilots had regained control and were able to take the aircraft to a suitable airport in Saudi Arabia.
Who Were the Two Other Pilots Who Took Control?
One of the remarkable circumstances of FZ1073 was that other qualified flydubai pilots were already on board.
Major reports have referred to two additional or reserve pilots. They entered the cockpit after the attacker was subdued and took over flying the Boeing 737 MAX 8.
Their names and detailed backgrounds had not been reliably released publicly at the time of writing. That means claims circulating online identifying individual pilots should be treated cautiously unless flydubai or another authoritative source confirms them.
The investigation should eventually clarify exactly which pilot took which seat, who made the decision to divert to Tabuk and how the cockpit was managed after the attack.
The Plumber, Dentist and Other Passengers Who Intervened
The actions of several passengers have become a major part of the FZ1073 story.
Yaniv Hayun: The Plumber Who Rushed Into the Cockpit
Yaniv Hayun, a 50-year-old Israeli plumber, was travelling with his family. He told Reuters that when the emergency developed he ran forward and became directly involved in stopping the attacker.
Hayun said he helped overpower the co-pilot and pulled back on the aircraft controls during the descent. He later credited years of watching Air Crash Investigation with giving him some idea of what he was looking at in the cockpit.
That should not be interpreted as suggesting an untrained passenger could normally fly or land a Boeing 737. The crucial difference on FZ1073 was that qualified pilots were also aboard and could take over once the immediate physical threat had been controlled.
Tzvika Manes
Tzvika Manes was another passenger identified as helping restrain the attacker. Reports say he helped bind the co-pilot using cords from airline headphones or earphones after he had been removed from the controls.
Dr Shota Musaev
Dentist Dr Shota Musaev was among those who responded to the emergency and helped the seriously wounded Captain Machchhar.
Assaf Rajuan
Assaf Rajuan, described in reporting as working in insurance or financial services, was also among the passengers who helped subdue the co-pilot.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog subsequently announced plans to recognise passengers involved in the intervention with a civilian heroism award.
How Did a Weapon Get Into the Cockpit?
This remains another unanswered question.
Early passenger accounts described a knife. Other reporting has questioned whether the weapon could instead have been an emergency tool already available in the cockpit.
Those possibilities have very different security implications. If a prohibited knife passed through crew screening, investigators would need to understand how. If an aircraft emergency tool was used, the focus would instead fall on access to equipment already legitimately carried on the flight deck.
Until investigators identify the weapon, it is safer to describe Captain Machchhar as having been stabbed rather than assert exactly what was used.
Why Could the Cockpit Door Be Opened?
Modern commercial-aircraft cockpit doors are reinforced to prevent unauthorised entry from the passenger cabin. That security measure was strengthened dramatically after the attacks of 11 September 2001.
FZ1073 illustrates the opposite security problem: what happens when the threat is already inside the locked cockpit.
Reports indicate Captain Machchhar managed to make access possible despite being injured. Investigators will examine the cockpit-door sequence closely, including the actions of both pilots and any emergency access attempted from the cabin.
What Is Being Investigated Now?
The incident crosses several jurisdictions. The aircraft was operated by a UAE airline, the alleged attacker is Omani, the captain is Indian, most passengers were Israeli and the aircraft landed in Saudi Arabia.
Among the questions investigators need to answer are:
- What was the co-pilot’s motive?
- Was the attack planned in advance?
- What weapon or object was used?
- How did the cockpit struggle begin?
- Exactly how was the cockpit door opened?
- Who initially stabilised the aircraft during the rapid descent?
- Which additional pilots took control and how were they rostered?
- Why was an Omani national assigned to the Tel Aviv route?
- Were all Israeli crew-security and clearance requirements followed?
- Were there warning signs in the co-pilot’s employment, security or medical history?
- What changes, if any, are needed to crew vetting and cockpit-security procedures?
What Has Flydubai Done Since the Incident?
Flydubai has suspended its Israel services following the incident while investigations continue. Replacement aircraft were sent to Saudi Arabia by flydubai to move passengers onwards to Israel.
The airline has urged people not to speculate about motive while authorities investigate what happened.
What We Know – and What We Still Do Not Know
There is now substantial evidence for the central sequence of events: Captain Smit Machchhar was attacked and seriously wounded; the aircraft entered a rapid descent; access to the cockpit was regained; passengers helped restrain the co-pilot; other qualified flydubai pilots took control; and FZ1073 landed safely at Tabuk.
What remains less certain is equally important. The attacker’s final motive has not yet been established through a completed investigation. His identity has not been officially published. The precise weapon remains unclear. The exact route-clearance rules governing an Omani pilot on an Israel-bound flight need clarification.
The incident onboard Flydubai flight FZ1073 turned what should have been a routine journey from Dubai to Tel Aviv into a serious in-flight emergency and an unexpected diversion to Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
While incidents of this nature are extremely unusual, the events surrounding FZ1073 demonstrate how quickly an aircraft’s plans can change when the safety of those onboard is at risk. As further official information becomes available, we will update this article to reflect any confirmed developments.
Start Planning Your Trip With Autistic Children
- Find out about the help available if you are travelling through an airport
- Discover whether a cruise with an autistic child would work for your family
- Find out how to make travelling with ADHD manageable
- Check out guides to all of the different destinations we have travelled to with autistic children
- Learn step-by-step how to set up the accessibility feature on Google maps
- Learn more about our favourite sensory toys for travelling
- Discover an app that helps you locate a playground anywhere in the world
- Always alerted last minute that the little one needs a toilet? Find a toilet anywhere with this app
- Turn travels into adventures with these map-based games for families
Start Planning Your Accessible Trip With Our Guides
You can click on each image to go directly to the guide for that topic.
